Blog

The present and future of advice and support for migrants in London

A new MRN briefing provides a picture of shifts in the provision of advice and support for migrants in London. Provision has been affected by cuts to funding but the effects have been unequally spread. Some areas of London are relatively well provided while others show big gaps. Legal aid proposals which have been postponed for six months could have a big effect in the future.
Explore More

Last week the Ministry of Justice announced that it would be delaying by six months its plans to reform the legal aid scheme. This is welcome news and hopefully in the interim period government will look at alternative ways of making savings in its budget without compromising access to justice for those most in need of it.

We have warned that some of the proposals would have disastrous consequences for migrant communities and for the voluntary and community sector organisations supporting them. As it is at the moment, managing in a financially sustainable way immigration advice contracts funded by the legal aid scheme is extremely difficult. Many private sector providers have withdrawn from this area of advice while the two largest voluntary sector providers went into administrator within a year of each other leaving tens of thousands of cases in limbo and a shortage of provision in many areas.

However, advice and support for migrants is facing pressure from other direction as well. Cuts to local authority third sector grant budgets have had a large impact on voluntary and community sector organisations, many of which provide these types of services. Cuts have varied between different local authorities with some ring fencing their budgets for third sector projects while others have passed on the cuts to this area. Even before the funding cuts, shifts from grant funding to commissioning services by the public sector had already brought big challenges for smaller organisations which often lacked the size and capacity to bid for the available contracts.

Specific funding for advice and support to asylum seekers and refugees has also been drastically cut forcing large organisations such as the Refugee Council to downsize and reorganise a lot of its advice provision.

Together, all these shifts present a very uncertain picture in terms of the advice and support that migrants have access to in London. Many organisations working with migrants, asylum seekers and refugees are having to restructure their work at the same time that many of the services with which they partner or have referrals agreements are also undergoing significant change.

Earlier this year, the Migrants Rights Network sought to make a rapid assessment of the effect of these shifts on the provision of advice and support to migrants in different areas of London. We had reports from some organisations that in some areas of the capital provision was very scarce while in other areas it seemed more stable. Similarly, other organisations were reporting that people were travelling long distances to get advice or support.

To get a better picture of the situation we produced a briefing on the provision of advice and support for migrants in London, gathering information in two ways. First, we reviewed the available reports on the impact of funding cuts and evaluated their implications for migrants and refugees. Second, we carried out interviews with key organisations in different areas of London to get a sense of how the provision of advice and support had changed in their area in the last year. This included immigration advice and advice on other issues such as housing, employment and welfare which migrants could access. It also included second tier support for migrant community organisations.

We found a rapidly evolving landscape of provision that nevertheless showed significant variation from one area of the capital to the other. In some areas of London funding cuts and reorganisation of services seem to be having an impact with a noticeable reduction in provision. In other areas there is a sense that things are holding steady but that further cuts such as those anticipated in the legal aid proposals could seriously affect provision. In yet other areas those people we spoke to felt that services were better protected, especially where local authorities had ring fenced funding for voluntary sector services.

The overall picture was one of evolution where the full impact of the current cuts is still filtering down and where further shifts could bring significant changes. Despite this evolving picture some patterns did emerge. These include:

  • Some areas of London are better served in terms of provision of advice and support for migrants than others.
  • In general, inner areas are better served. Especially the outer west and south present significant gaps.
  • Some of the larger providers have scaled back outreach work which has a big effect on some outer areas.
  • The role of local authorities in protecting services through ring fencing of funds for third sector providers is a key factor in the stability of advice.
  • Legal aid changes could have a devastating effect, especially in areas where most provision relies on community law centres and CABs.

The full extent of the effects of funding cuts on advice provision and support for migrants in London remains to be seen and we will continue to monitor changes. However, two factors will play a crucial role in future developments: whether local authorities can be convinced of the importance of protecting existing services and whether the legal aid reforms are implemented in full and any measures that may be taken to mitigate their impact.

We would welcome feedback on how advice and other services for migrants have been affected in your areas: have services closed down? has there been a change in demand for advice? has your local authority taken action to protect services?

Other users went on to read:


Comments

I am really bewildered at the comments made by Juan Camilo on the advice service in Ealing.
It seems to me that he has no idea what goes on Ealing and has probably relied on fake and false information. With due respect to his degree he does not seem to me to be aware of the advice work here in the borough of Ealing

We at MECMAC, a Quality Mark accredited by CLS in (8) categories (generalist advice and case work) are the sole recognised voluntary service provider of the generalist advice and information for BMER in Ealing and also an alternative provider to Law for All for non-legal aid work and the lead of the Consortia for CAIA, TALLO and Havelock Centres in Ealing, which is supported and funded by Ealing Council.

Ealing resdients do not seek advice in Hillingdon and neither REAP nor REC are not capable of providing such service. So please make sure you have accurate and true information

Good luck in your good work

I do aplogise for small oversight error in my email....."are not capable" should read "are capable"

Kind regards
Edmond

Dear Edmond,
This blog and the briefing paper are aimed at providing a general overview of the situation in London at the moment and is not a comprehensive listing of advice services. I believe the document made that clear. It also made clear that due to the way in which we collected the information there will be areas in which our information will be stronger than in other areas of London. Hopefully through comments in this blog we can come up with a fuller picture of what is happening.

Where there have been omissions and mistakes I am happy to make corrections and additions to the document as these are pointed out, including mentioning MECMAC in the relevant section.

Having said that, I do find your comment somewhat harsh. The briefing says that 'Despite the closure of some large advice providers, Ealing appears to have a relatively healthy migrant support sector.' Hillingdon is mentioned in the context of having a CAB and a Law Centre where Ealing had lost theirs. It then goes on to say 'Despite these blows to provision in the borough, Ealing Advice Forum remains active, the REC takes on some case work and there are a number of other organisations providing advice.' I am not sure this makes the information fake or false in the ways you suggest.

As I said, I am happy to add MECMAC as providing advice in line with the information you have provided.

A note on commenting

Due to recent increased commenting activity we have taken the decision to disable commenting on old blogs. As we are a small office it is simply impossible to fight spam and keep removing comments that don’t comply with our house rules on what is now an archive of over 800 pieces.

We have also decided to take a more proactive role in enforcing our blog house rules on the blogs where comments are open. The rules are there for a good reason and we want to make sure we are consistent and apply them across the board. 

This is not in any shape or form meant to stifle debate, but to make sure that it remains civil and on topic.

Thanks and best regards,

--MRN Team

http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/about/blog-rules

MRN blogging and comments – Policy and House Rules

Your comments

1. Please be civil– we will remove anything that:

  • Is considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others
  • Is racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable
  • Contains swear words or other language likely to offend
  • Breaks the law, condones or encourage unlawful activity or which could endanger the safety or well-being of others
  • Impersonates someone else
  • advertises products or services

2. Comments that could damage the reputation of a person or organisation, that risk prejudicing on-going or forthcoming court proceedings or that could place MRN in contravention of its legal and/or regulatory obligations will be removed.

3. Please make comments relevant to the subject of the article. We may remove comments that we consider to be spam or which are unrelated to the article content against which they are posted.

4. Please keep the number of comments you make on a topic reasonable. Too many posts from an individual or small group can discourage other readers from joining the conversation.

5. In exceptional cases we may get a high volume of similar comments on a post. In these cases we may close comments for that post, adding a note letting you know that further comments will not be published.

6. By submitting comments to this site, you warrant that such comments are not defamatory nor infringe any law. You agree to indemnify MRN against all legal fees, damages and other expenses that may be incurred by MRN as a result of your breach of the above warranty.