Blog

The US election suggests there is a wider crisis for conservative thinking on migration

There is an energetic scrabble taking place at the moment to learn the lessons which are emerging for democratic societies where an increasing proportion of voters are made up of first, second and third generation migrants.

The role immigration has played in the US presidential election has been much–commented upon, right from the moment when Obama declared his intention to ‘fix the system’ in his victory speech.

Migrants in US elections
Photo: Tricia Wang

There is an energetic scrabble taking place at the moment to learn the lessons which are emerging for democratic societies where an increasing proportion of voters are made of up first, second and third generation migrants. Whilst the US is to the forefront of this process of re-consideration, its implications also extend into Europe and the United Kingdom.

From the viewpoint of the United States, law professor and migrants rights blogger César Garcia has set out the dilemma for US politicians in the starkest terms in his recent commentary on the outcome of the election. With the result apparently balanced for so long, victory finally went to the candidate most skilled at assembling a coalition of support from the country’s disparate ‘values voters’ – including among the country’s 50 million strong Latino community.  So will the Democrats now be able to keep this important voting block in their camp, or will the Republicans alter their course to poach them?

Obama, who despite his liberal image still managed to deport nearly 400,000 people in 2011, is certainly not off the hook as far as migrant communities are concerned. But the bigger problem undoubtedly exists for the Republican right-wing.  Years of vilifying largely peaceful migrants have made them unpopular among these communities. 

Leading figures in the Republican camp are floundering for a new narrative that will get them out the hole they have dug for themselves.  For the time-being the favoured option, voiced by such figures as John Boehner, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, FOX newscaster Sean Hannity, and right wing newspaper columnist Charles Krauthammer, is for ‘border security plus amnesty’, allowing a proportion of those already in the country to remain whilst slamming the door on the arrival of newcomers.

This is a significant shift in the positioning of conservative opinion whose influence has, over the years, extended beyond the US and into the centre right parties of Europe.  The notion that it is not such a great idea to make enemies of people who are still highly conscious of their origins in migration has certainly got out into the British Conservative Party.  Though making up only around 10% of the electorate, the black and Asian vote in the UK tends to cluster around 40-odd constituencies where their demographic weight is considerably larger.

According to Professor Mohammed Anwar’s 2010 study, black and ethnic minority (BME) voters are showing signs of a commitment to electoral politics which is leaving the white majority community behind.  People of south Asian ethnicity in particular show voting participation rates of around 70%; a full 10% higher than their white counterparts.

Astute Tories are acknowledging the fact that they are lagging behind when it comes to support from ethnic groups with recent immigrant origins.  Lord Ashcroft, considering these matters for his party in his ‘Project Blueprint’ report published earlier this summer, pointed to the gap in support from BME communities for the Conservatives in 2010. He advocated a combination of “well thought out” immigration policies plus a “tough” policy on Europe as the route back to popularity for the sort of interests he imagined are bound up in black and Asian communities. However, as recent parliamentary developments have shown, the coalescence of immigration with European themes easily leads to anti-Europe and anti-immigration rhetoric.

Certainly the spotlight will now be on the role of immigration and how far it is likely to affect voting decisions among BME communities in 2015. It is still not clear how far immigration policy in the UK is a salient issue with BME voters, and likely that there is variation across different communities depending on how their experience of migration in the UK began. But it seems likely that a narrative on immigration that does not meet the interests of migrant communities will not result in an increase in voter support.

The US election result has allowed people on this side of the Atlantic to gaze on their own future at many levels – immigration policy being just one.  It has also revealed a crisis in conservative thinking on the issue and the contradictions that will need to be overcome in order to rebuild a coherent policy on squaring the movement of people across borders with economic efficiency and social justice. 

What the world looks like from the standpoint of the liberal centre-left  when it ponders immigration in these early decades of the 21st century is, however, no less disconcerting.  It is a subject this author will return to in a future blog.

Other users went on to read:


Comments

Bradford West was the litmus test and it showed dramatically the results of beating up on immigrants. Their family, friends and associates mobilised to vote against major parties. The same will happen in future elections as well. Fantastic, I say.

The next forgotten group is the British Diaspora. Unless you are born of someone born in UK there is no easy way to resettle back into UK where your family came from.

British tourism relies on the British Diaspora believing that they can return to Britain to live if they so chose to do so. Very very few would as they have too many connections where they are settled now. BUT our tourism relies on their belief that they can and would be welcome back "home". After all not one of their ancestors ever relinquished theirs or their descendants rights to live in the UK. Successive UK governments quietly removed the Diaspora rights of resettlement back into UK.

As the Diaspora are now realising that they are definitely NOT welcome back "home" their reasoning for visiting as tourists is rapidly waning as well.
With that trend these xenophobic vote chasers are destroying yet another British industry and the jobs and incomes in that industry and the taxes collected from it.
That was not even enough for the xenophobes, European free movement is also now under attack. That is also going to cost dearly in votes, economic growth and taxation too.

Not very clever or smart at all is it?
Beating up on Immigrants and British Diaspora and European free movement.
Not very smart at all !!

A note on commenting

Due to recent increased commenting activity we have taken the decision to disable commenting on old blogs. As we are a small office it is simply impossible to fight spam and keep removing comments that don’t comply with our house rules on what is now an archive of over 800 pieces.

We have also decided to take a more proactive role in enforcing our blog house rules on the blogs where comments are open. The rules are there for a good reason and we want to make sure we are consistent and apply them across the board. 

This is not in any shape or form meant to stifle debate, but to make sure that it remains civil and on topic.

Thanks and best regards,

--MRN Team

http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/about/blog-rules

MRN blogging and comments – Policy and House Rules

Your comments

1. Please be civil– we will remove anything that:

  • Is considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others
  • Is racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable
  • Contains swear words or other language likely to offend
  • Breaks the law, condones or encourage unlawful activity or which could endanger the safety or well-being of others
  • Impersonates someone else
  • advertises products or services

2. Comments that could damage the reputation of a person or organisation, that risk prejudicing on-going or forthcoming court proceedings or that could place MRN in contravention of its legal and/or regulatory obligations will be removed.

3. Please make comments relevant to the subject of the article. We may remove comments that we consider to be spam or which are unrelated to the article content against which they are posted.

4. Please keep the number of comments you make on a topic reasonable. Too many posts from an individual or small group can discourage other readers from joining the conversation.

5. In exceptional cases we may get a high volume of similar comments on a post. In these cases we may close comments for that post, adding a note letting you know that further comments will not be published.

6. By submitting comments to this site, you warrant that such comments are not defamatory nor infringe any law. You agree to indemnify MRN against all legal fees, damages and other expenses that may be incurred by MRN as a result of your breach of the above warranty.