Migration Pulse

Access to Primary Health Care for migrants is a right worth defending

As the NHS faces up to the realities of the Government cuts, calls to restrict further migrants’ access to free NHS services, are growing. This is not something new, but the evidence suggests that excluding migrants would actually increase costs, leave all of us at greater risk of ill health, and undermine the integrity of the NHS.
January 16, 2011
Profile photo
Wayne Farah

Wayne Farah is Chair of the Migrants’ Rights Network, as well as Vice Chair for Newham Primary Care Trust. He has been a Visiting Lecturer at London Metropolitan University where he helped develop the Certificate in Education Partnership for refugee teachers. He is on the Board of the Mental Health Mentoring Project for the Migrant & Refugee Communities Forum as well as Vision Care.

As Nye Bevan explained when he created the NHS:

“One of the consequences of the universality of the British Health Service is the free treatment of foreign visitors. This has given rise to a great deal of criticism, most of it ill informed and some of it deliberately mischievous… The whole agitation has a nasty taste. Instead of rejoicing at the opportunity to practice a civilized principle, Conservatives have tried to exploit the most disreputable emotions in this among many other attempts to discredit socialized medicine.”

The evidence suggests that abandoning Nye Bevan’s civilised principle by excluding migrants from the NHS will increase costs and undermine the integrity of the NHS. It will also leave all of us at greater risk of ill health, and undermine the social inclusion strategies needed to reduce health inequalities.

However, across the UK migrants are already experiencing difficulties registering with a GP because of widespread confusion over the differences between the primary care rules on eligibility and the secondary care rules on entitlement for overseas visitors.

The NHS is not a “public fund” as defined by the “recourse to public funds rules”. There are regulations to charge some people who are not ordinarily resident in the UK for some hospital treatments. Eligibility for free primary care is unaffected by these regulations and there is no law that requires anyone to be ‘resident’ for any length of time, or have a visa etc., in order to access free NHS primary care.

GPs have complete discretion to register whomever they wish (Paragraph 17, Schedule 6 and Paragraph 16, Schedule 5 NHS Regulations 2004). They can refuse to register someone on reasonable grounds but they must not discriminate because of health status, race, social class etc. Many GPs demand proof of immigration status before they will register some patients. However, as immigration status does not affect eligibility to primary care such checks are unnecessary and refusing to register a patient because of their immigration status would be unlawful and unethical.

Migrant’s rights campaigners therefore need to make greater use of the law to ensure that GPs do not deny migrants access to primary care. They should also support the campaigns against the Government’s plans for the NHS and lobby health professionals to support the European Declaration of Health Professionals – Towards non-discriminatory access to health care.

You can download the full article co-authored by Wayne Farah (MRN Chair), Adam Hundt (Pierce Glynn Solicitor) and Fizza Qureshi (Doctors of the World UK) in a PDF format.


Excellent article - really important. Thanks so much for doing this.

A note on commenting

Due to recent increased commenting activity we have taken the decision to disable commenting on old blogs. As we are a small office it is simply impossible to fight spam and keep removing comments that don’t comply with our house rules on what is now an archive of over 800 pieces.

We have also decided to take a more proactive role in enforcing our blog house rules on the blogs where comments are open. The rules are there for a good reason and we want to make sure we are consistent and apply them across the board. 

This is not in any shape or form meant to stifle debate, but to make sure that it remains civil and on topic.

Thanks and best regards,

--MRN Team


MRN blogging and comments – Policy and House Rules

Your comments

1. Please be civil– we will remove anything that:

  • Is considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others
  • Is racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable
  • Contains swear words or other language likely to offend
  • Breaks the law, condones or encourage unlawful activity or which could endanger the safety or well-being of others
  • Impersonates someone else
  • advertises products or services

2. Comments that could damage the reputation of a person or organisation, that risk prejudicing on-going or forthcoming court proceedings or that could place MRN in contravention of its legal and/or regulatory obligations will be removed.

3. Please make comments relevant to the subject of the article. We may remove comments that we consider to be spam or which are unrelated to the article content against which they are posted.

4. Please keep the number of comments you make on a topic reasonable. Too many posts from an individual or small group can discourage other readers from joining the conversation.

5. In exceptional cases we may get a high volume of similar comments on a post. In these cases we may close comments for that post, adding a note letting you know that further comments will not be published.

6. By submitting comments to this site, you warrant that such comments are not defamatory nor infringe any law. You agree to indemnify MRN against all legal fees, damages and other expenses that may be incurred by MRN as a result of your breach of the above warranty.