Migration Pulse

Does the decision to extend restrictions for Bulgarians and Romanians make sense?

It seems that the latest move by the UK Government to extend labour market restrictions for Bulgarians and Romanians (also known as A2 nationals) until the end of 2013 is based more on an ideological argument than proper understanding of how the internal EU labour market works.
January 12, 2012
Profile photo
Zvezda Vankova

Zvezda Vankova is a program coordinator and researcher at the Law Program of the Open Society Institute Sofia and is currently a PhD candidate at the Law faculty of the Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Her areas of professional interest include migration policies, asylum and free movement of persons, human rights protection, police reform and accountability. Recently, she was the national expert and coordinator of MIPEX III for Bulgaria and implemented independent monitoring in the Detention centres for irregular migrants in Bulgaria.

As the latest research by Open Society Institute shows, it is mostly internal factors and not external barriers that influence the decision of A2 workers to migrate.

The report indicates that the big waves of outward migration from Bulgaria had already happened before the EU membership and that there is currently little real incentive for Bulgarians to migrate. This is further substantiated by the fact that the number of migrants coming to the UK from Bulgaria is slowing down. 

Report CoverIn fact extending transitional measures makes little sense, since they are unlikely to restrict migration but only keep a greater number of Bulgarians and Romanians on the illegal labour market – argument stressed by the European Commission and the JCWI. EC report also points out that net inflow from both countries has been very limited or has decreased following the opening of the labour markets of some of the EU members. 

For example unlike the UK Italy abolished the transitional restrictions for Bulgarians and Romanians as of 1 January 2012, even though it is one of the two main destination countries for these workers.

Understanding the trends

In the past internal factors such as large differences in salaries, lack of social support and public service provision, as well as high unemployment and lack of opportunities, were the main reasons behind the emigration of Bulgarians. This mostly coincided with the period of severe economic crisis in the 1990s, which motivated Bulgarians to leave the country and look for employment elsewhere.

After the period of recession the Bulgarian economy gradually improved. New jobs were created, while income and living standards increased which led to a slowdown in emigration. At this point the average annual emigration marked a 28% decline.

According to the latest national survey data of OSI looking into migration patterns - only 4,7% of the interviewed Bulgarians who have been abroad in the past 20 years had spent more than 3 months in the UK.  

This decline was marked despite the fact that visas for Bulgarians in the UK were abolished when the country joined the EU.

Considering that only 11% of all Bulgarians willing to emigrate would choose UK as their destination of choice, fear that Bulgarians would start flooding the UK labour market if transitional restrictions would be lifted seems further unfounded. In that respect the UK ranks only forth after Germany (18,2%), Spain (15,5%) and Italy (13,6%).

Another great public concern is emigration of Roma to the UK for the purpose of claiming social benefits. This is rather a result of media overexposure of individual incidents and is not an evidence based trend. OSI’s nationally representative survey of the Roma community in Bulgaria shows that only 12% of the interviewed Roma and 16.5% of the members of their households have worked abroad in the last 20 years. 

84.2% of Roma and 73% of the Bulgarians, who had spent time abroad in the last 20 years, have done so in order to work. This means that employment is even more important reason for emigration among the Roma community than among the Bulgarian population. It is also important to stress, that the UK ranks ninth among the preferable destinations for Roma emigrants and is lagging behind Greece, Germany, Spain, and Italy which are the most desired destinations.

The full report by the Open Society Institute "Bulgarian Labour Migration: Do restrictions make sense?" can be accessed in a PDF format.


There is a tangible terror of horse and carts full of flouncy skirted, earring jangling, dark skinned shoplifters and skinny long legged pimp husbands crossing the channel, it emanates from the UKBA. They may not want to appear racist, but the fear of Balkan Roma is indeed simply that.

There well may well be some Roma, and they will not need to study our culture or language but will try to get work fruit picking and chopping wood if they can. My experience is that they might just work unbelievably hard, too. Oh and some of them might be IT specialists too.

I wonder how many Brits still live over there, living off their UK pensions and sickness benefits, not speaking a word of Bulgarian and enjoying the cheap wine and fags, contributing little to the culture.

We are so ungenerous, when I went to live in Bulgaria I was given help, food, blankets and human warmth. These guys will get met with cold stares and attempts to get them out of the country. I have been given lifts in Roma horse and carts and felt the warmth of human kindness, Bulgarians are so generous they are in for a shock.

A note on commenting

Due to recent increased commenting activity we have taken the decision to disable commenting on old blogs. As we are a small office it is simply impossible to fight spam and keep removing comments that don’t comply with our house rules on what is now an archive of over 800 pieces.

We have also decided to take a more proactive role in enforcing our blog house rules on the blogs where comments are open. The rules are there for a good reason and we want to make sure we are consistent and apply them across the board. 

This is not in any shape or form meant to stifle debate, but to make sure that it remains civil and on topic.

Thanks and best regards,

--MRN Team


MRN blogging and comments – Policy and House Rules

Your comments

1. Please be civil– we will remove anything that:

  • Is considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others
  • Is racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable
  • Contains swear words or other language likely to offend
  • Breaks the law, condones or encourage unlawful activity or which could endanger the safety or well-being of others
  • Impersonates someone else
  • advertises products or services

2. Comments that could damage the reputation of a person or organisation, that risk prejudicing on-going or forthcoming court proceedings or that could place MRN in contravention of its legal and/or regulatory obligations will be removed.

3. Please make comments relevant to the subject of the article. We may remove comments that we consider to be spam or which are unrelated to the article content against which they are posted.

4. Please keep the number of comments you make on a topic reasonable. Too many posts from an individual or small group can discourage other readers from joining the conversation.

5. In exceptional cases we may get a high volume of similar comments on a post. In these cases we may close comments for that post, adding a note letting you know that further comments will not be published.

6. By submitting comments to this site, you warrant that such comments are not defamatory nor infringe any law. You agree to indemnify MRN against all legal fees, damages and other expenses that may be incurred by MRN as a result of your breach of the above warranty.