Migration Pulse

Share your story! - Rights of international students

The rights of international students studying in the UK are under unprecedented attack in order to satisfy the Government target of reducing “net migration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands.” The NUS International Students’ Campaign has launched a social media campaign to get the voice of international students heard and paint a picture of what international students are really going through.
March 19, 2012
Profile photo
Daniel Stevens

Daniel Stevens is a Brazilian MSc. Student and the former President of Warwick SU. He currently sits on the NUS National Executive Council. NUS (National Union of Students) is a confederation of 600 students' unions. Through their member students' unions, they represent the interests of more than seven million students.

I still remember where I was, when the term “net migration” first entered the political discourse in April 2010. As the President-Elect of Warwick Students’ Union I was in the library studying for my impending final exams and watching the Prime Ministerial debates.

Share yous story - NUS CampaignThe first question posed was on immigration highlighting its electoral significance at the time. David Cameron responded by attacking Labour’s record and boasting the Conservative Government’s target of reducing “net migration from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands”. So contentious was immigration that year that an independent think tank, Demos, later found it was one of key the reasons voters left Labour due to their perceived moderate stance. Little did I know at the time how serious the implications of that electoral sound-bite would be. Ever since taking office, Immigration Minister Damian Green and Home Secretary Theresa May have continued to allude to and reaffirm this commitment. 

However, due to student visas, the coalition Government's net migration target is virtually impossible. Net migration was around 252,000 last year. Most of that figure consisted of student migration (255,000 student visas were issued last year). This has led to the Government cracking down on student visas by any and all means with brutal new requirements and the removal of rights for international students in order to desperately find a way to meet this target by the next general election.

Just some (and I emphasize some) controversial new policies that have been implemented include:

  • The pricing out of International students. International students are being priced out of a UK Education through extortionate visa fees, maintenance requirements and the requirement to pay for their University fees upfront making it certain that only the affluent can choose to study in the UK. Visa fees have been increasing year on year, and the amount international students must show in their bank accounts before arrival will now increase by £5400 to £7200 for those outside Inner London.
  • Increasing English Language Requirements. At the same time, English language requirements have increased with international students having to take exams which even some native speakers couldn’t even pass.
  • Removing Rights from International Students. The rights of international students are being removed. The right to a Post-study work visa will be removed on 6 April and the new work route uses salary limit to means-test those who can stay. Mature Undergraduate students can no longer bring their families to the UK and those in private colleges have no working rights.
  • Increasing the Requirements for Colleges to Recruit International Students.Dozens of colleges have shut down courses because they can no longer afford new requirements for educational oversight for international students. This has left thousands of international students in a limbo where they have a visa for a course that no longer exists and is thus invalid. Not only that, the UKBA has recently threatened to ban collegesin Scotland from recruiting international students. This would mean that potentially thousands of international students would be forced to return home. What is more worrying is that this is only the beginning of the UKBA’s crackdown on colleges in the name of compliance.

Shockingly enough- these are still severely lenient policies when compared to the Government’s original draconian proposals back in December of 2010 which would have brutally destroyed the pre-degree education sector including A-levels and foundation programs.

Do the public really even want this? A recent poll conducted by the Migration Observatory found that only 30% of respondents were in favor of reducing HE/FE international student numbers. Even then, I’ve found that most negative attitude towards international students comes from misunderstandings of their benefits (cultural, cross subsidization of home students, diplomatic ties, etc.) Regardless, no one from the Government is willing to make a public stand for international students in the midst of this crackdown - neither Labour nor the Liberal Democrats.

The NUS International Students’ Campaign has launched a new social campaign called “Share Your Story.” Our hope is to get international students involved in the campaign, collect case studies, start painting a narrative and encourage them to write to their local MPs about what’s really happening due to the Government’s net migration policies. Over a thousand international students have already liked the page with many more sending in their stories. Newcastle, LSE, and SOAS have all done activities locally to promote awareness about the campaign.

Some of the stories really bring to life some of the key issues. One student missed his Uncle’s funeral because the UKBA was holding his passport for an extended period of time. Many mentioned the thousands of pounds spent on visa fees and trivial mistakes on visa applications which meant entire applications had to be redone and the visa fee repaid.

Another mentioned his friend who could not take up a job and had to return to his home country because his visa was rejected on a trivial ground.  Just the other day at SOAS, a woman mentioned that a company reneged on her job offer a few months ago when they found out she was an international student. One student from LSE highlighted that he would never have gotten a job offer without the use of Post-study work visa to do an internship after his studies. A representative from the Royal College of Art said their international students could never dream to able to meet the new salary requirements.

It’s difficult to stress how the mood has changed in the UK. At my own Postgraduate course at Warwick, visas have become a nightmare. I’ve met worried and frustrated international students at virtually every University I’ve traveled to from Coventry to SOAS.

International students are being victimized for nothing more than political reasons. We’re an easy target. Help us build momentum with this campaign. Like the page and encourage your friends to do so as well. Write to your local MP. Share Your Story.


The changes to the Tier 4 immigration rules setting a 5, 6 or 8 year time limit for studies is in effect ending the 10 year long residency rules for students in the UK. However, I find it bizzare that the government has chosen to do this rather than just remove students from qualifying for ILR - but with transitional period in place to avoid unfairly punishing those already in the UK.

I also heard that the UKBA is intentionally refusing or declaring applications invalid for those students already in the UK for at least 8 or 9 years in order to disrupt their eligibility for ILR at 10 years. THIS IS SAD STATE OF AFFAIRS IN THE UK. IT IS INDEED CLOSED FOR BUSINESS = PROTECTIONISM IN THE HIGHEST ORDER.

Great to see this gathering of experiences going on in other areas too. I'm attempring to do the same thing for sponsors and spouses in family immigration with familyimmigrationalliance.wordpress.com The more human stories are put out there the better.

A note on commenting

Due to recent increased commenting activity we have taken the decision to disable commenting on old blogs. As we are a small office it is simply impossible to fight spam and keep removing comments that don’t comply with our house rules on what is now an archive of over 800 pieces.

We have also decided to take a more proactive role in enforcing our blog house rules on the blogs where comments are open. The rules are there for a good reason and we want to make sure we are consistent and apply them across the board. 

This is not in any shape or form meant to stifle debate, but to make sure that it remains civil and on topic.

Thanks and best regards,

--MRN Team


MRN blogging and comments – Policy and House Rules

Your comments

1. Please be civil– we will remove anything that:

  • Is considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others
  • Is racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable
  • Contains swear words or other language likely to offend
  • Breaks the law, condones or encourage unlawful activity or which could endanger the safety or well-being of others
  • Impersonates someone else
  • advertises products or services

2. Comments that could damage the reputation of a person or organisation, that risk prejudicing on-going or forthcoming court proceedings or that could place MRN in contravention of its legal and/or regulatory obligations will be removed.

3. Please make comments relevant to the subject of the article. We may remove comments that we consider to be spam or which are unrelated to the article content against which they are posted.

4. Please keep the number of comments you make on a topic reasonable. Too many posts from an individual or small group can discourage other readers from joining the conversation.

5. In exceptional cases we may get a high volume of similar comments on a post. In these cases we may close comments for that post, adding a note letting you know that further comments will not be published.

6. By submitting comments to this site, you warrant that such comments are not defamatory nor infringe any law. You agree to indemnify MRN against all legal fees, damages and other expenses that may be incurred by MRN as a result of your breach of the above warranty.