|
|
 |
Economic Migration
Objectives of managed migration policy
The
demand for migrant labour to relieve acute labour and sectoral skill
shortages has led to a change of direction in policy thinking on migration
- from immigration control to migration management.
The shift in policy language has come out of a consensus that by managing
migration, the U.K. will benefit
from a range of economic and social outcomes. According to the five-year
strategy on asylum and immigration the principal objectives are to
attract the brightest and the best workers from across the world in
order to:
- sustain economic growth
and ease inflationary pressure;
- increase innovation
and productivity;
- respond to the challenges
of global economic change; and
- remain competitive
in the global economy.
To
ensure these objectives are being effectively met, a top to bottom
review of managed migration was initiated in 2004 (Home Office, 2004).
The review concluded that the previous system had become too complex
and bureaucratic . In response high-level reform was proposed to bring
together all the existing work schemes and students into a single
points-based system with a five tier framework (Home Office, 2006).
The
new managed migration system builds on this policy trajectory to select
and allow only highly skilled and skilled workers to settle, with
settlement criteria based on levels of human capital, language ability
and previous earnings. At the opposite end of the skills spectrum,
there is now very limited provision for sectors and industries in
need of low skilled workers, as existing low-skilled schemes are to
be phased out in response to the numbers of workers available from
the EU accession states. All that will remain will be quota-based
low skilled schemes which are set-up with countries that have effective
returns arrangements.
Other
changes include some categories of migrant workers requiring a sponsor
and for workers from high-risk countries or visa categories, individuals
will be required to provide financial bonds.
The
new system has attracted criticism as the arrangements for low skilled
migration, according to the CRE and the TUC, are akin to a ‘guest-worker’
scheme. They argue that this will undermine integration and create
a two-tier workforce. The requirement to provide a financial bond
has also been criticised as potentially stigmatising certain communities
(CRE, 2005) and increasing the potential for exploitation of vulnerable
migrant workers (TUC, 2005).
For
more on economic migration and the objectives of the managed migration
system see:
Home
Office (2002) Secure
borders and Safe haven: Integration with diversity in modern Britain, London:
TSO. (PDF)
Home
Office (2004) Managed
migration review.
Commission
for Racial Equality (2005) Selective
admission: Making Migration work for Britain – CRE Consultation Response.
London:
CRE.(Word doc)
Home
Office (2005) Selective
admission: Making migration work for Britain. London:
TSO. Available at:
Home
Office (2005 ) Controlling
our borders: Making migration work for Britain. A five year strategy for
asylum and immigration.
London: TSO. (PDF)
TUC
(2005) Making
a rights based migration system work. London: TUC. (PDF)
Home
Office (2006) A
points-based system: Making migration work for Britain.
London:
TSO.
|
Back to Index
Page of Migrants Opportunities Map | |
|
 |
|