|
|
 |
Social Inclusion,
Integration and Citizenship
Policy overview: from multiculturalism to cohesion
Policies
on integration and multiculturalism underwent a sea-change in 2002.
The shift was away from policies emphasising diversity to policies
focusing on promoting cohesion and a new emphasis on the need to build
a stronger sense of shared identity and belonging. The catalysts behind these changes were mainly the Northern
England disturbances in the summer 2001 - as well as the
events of 11 September 2001. In the aftermath of the disturbances a series of reports
were commissioned to investigate the causes. [1] The prognosis was of high degrees of segregation and disadvantage
often reinforced by initiatives and programmes premised on promoting
diversity and cultural difference. This
marked a sharp shift away for multicultural policies aimed at promoting
respect for cultural difference and an increased concern about diversity
in public debate.
The
Cantle report following these investigations recommended the promotion
of community cohesion and the establishing of a stronger notion of
citizenship based on common principles prioritised over cultural differences.
The promotion of cohesion initially marked a changed policy
in response to difficulties experienced by settled, second generation
ethnic minority communities. However, this approach has come to encompass
more recent migrants too. The Community
Cohesion Panel reporting in 2004 made recommendations for ‘managed
settlement’ policies to complement ‘managed migration’
policies. Community cohesion approaches
are being developed through numerous initiatives and schemes that
aim to break barriers between communities in diverse ways.
Following
on from these changes there has been increased media debate on the
possibility of Britain
becoming ‘Too diverse’. In
2004 David Goodhart, editor of Prospect magazine, sparked this debate
by positing a dilemma for the political left between its values of
solidarity and diversity. Frequently fears about the social fragmentation are attributed
to immigration. More recently gains made
by the British National Party at the 2006 local elections in Barking
and Dagenham have prompted concerns about politics and policy engaging
the white working classes apparently losing out to migration. This led former Labour Minister Frank Field to question
the sustainability of current immigration levels.
The
most recent policy statement on integration in 2005 combines race
equality policies across public service provision with cohesion policies
aimed at young people and immigrants with citizenship-related initiatives.
There is a separate raft of policies aimed at fostering refugee
integration but the national refugee integration forum this set up
has been disbanded. More research is investigating the tensions between
indigenous working people and newcomers and anti-immigration.
The prominence of policies seeking to emphasize cohesion over
the differentiated approach attributed to multiculturalism is highlighted
by Tony Blair’s speech on the ‘duty to integrate’
marking in December 2006.
For
more on integration policies:
Blair,
T (2006) ‘The
Duty to Integrate: Shared British Values
Goodhart,
D (2004) ‘Too
diverse?’ in Prospect magazine
Home
Office (2005) Improving
Opportunity, Strengthening Society
Home
Office (2005) Integration
Matters: A National Strategy for Refugee Integration (PDF)
Footnotes:
[1]
Ouseley, H (2001) Community
Pride not Prejudice. Ritchie, D (2001) One Oldham One Future. Clarke , T (2001) Burnley
Speaks, Who Listens?. David Ritchie, Oldham Panel, One Oldham,
One Future, 2001. Cantle, T (2001) Community
Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review Team
|
Back to Index
Page of Migrants Opportunities Map | |
|
 |
|